<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Packaging Design: The Butt of the Joke</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anendlessarray.com/2008/04/packaging-design-the-butt-of-the-joke/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anendlessarray.com/2008/04/packaging-design-the-butt-of-the-joke/</link>
	<description>anEndlessArray(of geekery);</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:06:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://anendlessarray.com/2008/04/packaging-design-the-butt-of-the-joke/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 18:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anendlessarray.com/blog1/2008/04/01/packaging-design-the-butt-of-the-joke/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>I am always in great appreciation of products that resemble animals. The toilet duck has a fond place in my heart.

That said, I want to mention that I in no way have an issue with Method or their packaging designs as large. I think they are a great company (and local to SF as well!) and admire their organic, non-toxic approach to home cleaning products.

The sponge clenched between butt cheeks was too amusing to ignore though :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am always in great appreciation of products that resemble animals. The toilet duck has a fond place in my heart.</p>
<p>That said, I want to mention that I in no way have an issue with Method or their packaging designs as large. I think they are a great company (and local to SF as well!) and admire their organic, non-toxic approach to home cleaning products.</p>
<p>The sponge clenched between butt cheeks was too amusing to ignore though <img src='http://anendlessarray.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Anderson</title>
		<link>http://anendlessarray.com/2008/04/packaging-design-the-butt-of-the-joke/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anendlessarray.com/blog1/2008/04/01/packaging-design-the-butt-of-the-joke/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>There is a long history in art and design, relating to the natural world, either in representation or juxtaposition. Rightly so, I guess, as it would be impossible to have either one, without one of the two. But that does not excuse bad decisions.

The fleshy, organesque trend in toiletries has been around for a while. Extending that to other products used in the bathroom seems to breach some trust between manufacturer and consumer. But alas, I am a snob and probably somewhat of a purest. A cleaning product should look like a cleaning product. &quot;Clean&quot; should come to mind before &quot;organic&quot;.

Maybe the designers at Method are graduates (or students, as the case may be) of The Design Center in Pasadena. Apparently, this kind of thinking is something they &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gugumu.com/mt/archives/000016.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;greatly encourage&lt;/a&gt;.

All joshing aside, give me the toilet duck any day, over a product that seems to be critical of what you put in your stomach, that ultimately led to the &lt;em&gt;un&lt;/em&gt;necessary need to clean.

Ahh, visual language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a long history in art and design, relating to the natural world, either in representation or juxtaposition. Rightly so, I guess, as it would be impossible to have either one, without one of the two. But that does not excuse bad decisions.</p>
<p>The fleshy, organesque trend in toiletries has been around for a while. Extending that to other products used in the bathroom seems to breach some trust between manufacturer and consumer. But alas, I am a snob and probably somewhat of a purest. A cleaning product should look like a cleaning product. &#8220;Clean&#8221; should come to mind before &#8220;organic&#8221;.</p>
<p>Maybe the designers at Method are graduates (or students, as the case may be) of The Design Center in Pasadena. Apparently, this kind of thinking is something they <a href="http://www.gugumu.com/mt/archives/000016.html" rel="nofollow">greatly encourage</a>.</p>
<p>All joshing aside, give me the toilet duck any day, over a product that seems to be critical of what you put in your stomach, that ultimately led to the <em>un</em>necessary need to clean.</p>
<p>Ahh, visual language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markasaurus</title>
		<link>http://anendlessarray.com/2008/04/packaging-design-the-butt-of-the-joke/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Markasaurus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anendlessarray.com/blog1/2008/04/01/packaging-design-the-butt-of-the-joke/#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Personally, I prefer the Toilet Duck. According to Wikipedia, it is becoming rare: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toilet_Duck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I prefer the Toilet Duck. According to Wikipedia, it is becoming rare: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toilet_Duck" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toilet_Duck</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
